Islamabad, the 3^rd July, 2004.

CUSTOMS GENERAL ORDER NO. 05/2004

The Central Board of Revenue is pleased to order that the following amendment shall be made in the Customs General Order No.12 of 2002 dated 15.06.2002, namely:­-

In CGO 12, chapter III, in sub-para (2) of the Rule 4 of the aforesaid Customs General Order, shall be substituted with new sub para as under:-­

“Goods Declaration (GD) of all types except Transhipment Permit (TP), already introduced, shall consist of four copies w.e.f. 1^st July 2004″.

The first three copies of GD shall be machine numbered and bear examination report. The Transhipment Permit shall consist of following four copies.

[13^th March. 1924]

An Act to provide for the

constitution of a Central Board of Revenue and to

amend certain, enactment’s for the purpose of confer­ring powers and imposing duties on the said board.

WHEREAS it is expedient to provide for the constitution of a Central Board of Revenue and to amend certain enactments for the purpose of conferring powers and imposing duties on the said Board ; It is hereby enacted as follows:—

1. Short title and commencement. — (1)  This Act may be called the Central Board of Revenue Act, 1924,

(2) It shall come into force on the first day of April, 1924,

2. Constitution of central Board of Revenue.  As soon as may be after the commencement of this Act, the [Federal Government] shall constitutes a Central Board of Revenue, consisting of one or more persons appointed by it], which shall be subject to the control of the [Federal Gov­ernment] in the exercise of such powers and the performance of such duties as may be entrusted to it by the Federal Govern­ment] or by or under any law.

3. Procedure of the Board.  (l) The Federal Government may make rules for the purpose of regulating the transaction of business by the Cen­tral Board of Revenue, and every order made or act done in accordance with such rules shall be deemed to be the order or act, as the case may be, of the Central Board of Revenue.

(2) Any rules under sub-section (1) may be made so as to be retrospective from any date not earlier than the commence­ment of this Act and such rules may also validate any acts done or orders made by, or any proceeding, of, the Central Board of Revenue or any of its Members or officers before the making of such rules which, if done, made or taken after the commencement of those rules,  would not be inconsistent therewith.

(3) No act, order or proceeding validated under sub-section (2) shall be called in question, merely en the ground that such act, order or proceeding was not valid at the time when it was done, made or taken.

THE SCHEDULE.

{ENACTMENTS AMENDED.]

Rep. by the Repealing and Amending Act. 1927 (XII of 1927), s. 2 and Schedule.

(VALIDATION OF LEVY OF FEES) ORDI€NANCE, 1967

(W.P. Ordinance I of 1967)

[23 May 1967]

An Ordinance to validate the levy, charging,

collection and realization of fees under the Bahawalpur Cotton (Control)

Act, 1949, from the occupiers of cotton factories, cotton dealers and managers of companies

Preamble : –

WHEREAS it is expedient to validate the levy, charging, collection and realization of fees under the Bahawalpur Cotton (Control) Act, 1949, from the occupiers of cotton ginning, cotton pressing and cotton seed oil factories, cotton dealers and managers of companies in certain areas of West Pakistan, for the period from 27th November 1949 to 8th May, 1954;

AND WHEREAS the Provincial Assembly of West Pakistan is not in session and the Governor of West Pakistan is satisfied that circumstances exist which render immediate legislation necessary;

Now, THEREFORE, in exercise of the powers conferred on him by clause (1) of Article 79 of the Constitution, the Governor of West Pakistan is pleased to make and promulgate the following Ordinance:-

1.         Short title and extent : – (1) This Ordinance may be called the Bahawalpur Cotton Control (Validation of Levy of Fees) Ordinance, 1967.

(2)       It extends to the Districts of Bahawalpur, Bahawalnagar and Rahimyar Khan.

2.         Validation of levy of fees, etc. from occupiers of cotton factories, etc : – Notwithstanding anything contained in clause (p) of section 30 of the Bahawalpur Cotton (Control) Act, 1949, before its amendment by the Bahawalpur Cotton (Control) (Amendment) Act, 1954, or any judgment or decree of any Court, the fees levied, charged, collected or realized from the occupiers of cotton ginning, cotton pressing or cotton seed oil factories, cotton dealers or managers of companies for the period from 27th November, 1949 to 8th May, 1954, in accordance with the provisions of the said clause (p) as substituted by the Bahawalpur Cotton (Control) (Amendment) Act, 1954, shall be deemed to have been validly levied, charged, collected or realised, as the case may be, and where any such fees have not been paid or realized before the coming into force of this Ordinance, the same shall be recoverable in accordance with the provisions of the said clause (p) as substituted by the Bahawalpur Cotton (Control) (Amendment) Act, 1954.

Government of Pakistan

State of Bank Pakistan

July 03, 2004

F.E. Circular No. 11 of 2004

Head Offices/Principal Offices of all

Authorised Dealers in Foreign Exchange

Dear Sirs/Madam

Amendments in Foreign Exchange Manual

Consequent upon the expiry of Authorised Money Changers licences on June 30, 2004 and in continuation of FE Circular Letter No. 01 dated February 12, 2004 and FE Circular No. 06 dated June 7, 2004, the following amendments have been made in the Foreign Exchange Manual (Eighth Edition – 2002):

Chapter I: The term “Authorised Money Changers” is deleted from line 8, para 2.

Chapter II: Para Nos. 5, 6 and 7 are deleted in entirety.

Chapter XI: The term “Money Changers” is deleted from the heading of para 1. Moreover, sub para (ii) of para 1 is amended to be read as under:

“Besides Authorised Dealers, the State Bank has granted licences/authorisations to resident Pakistani entities/companies to purchase and sell foreign currency notes and coins. They are required to follow the code of conduct prescribed for them from time to time.”

Similarly, the words “and Money Changers” are deleted from the heading of para 3 as well as from line no. 2 of para 3.

Further, line no. 6 of para 4 i.e. “Such … customers.” stands deleted.

In addition, the words “AMC” or “Authorised Money Changer/s” stand deleted wherever appearing in the Manual.

Please bring the above to the notice of your constituents and others concerned

Yours faithfully,

(Azhar Kureshi)

Director

            No. Intg. 10‑31/64 (ii).‑In exercise of the powers conferred by section 26 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 (Act No. XXXV of 1964), the Governor of West Pakistan is pleased to make the following rules, namely: ‑

1.                     These rules may be called the West Pakistan Family Courts Rules, 1965.

2.                     In these rules, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context :‑

(a)             “Act” means the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 (Act XXXV of 1964);

(b)            ¹["Court" means the Family Court established under the West Pakistan Family Courts Act], XXXV of 1964;

(c)             “form” means a form appended to these rules, ²[and]

(d)               “section” means a section of the Act.

(e)                3[Suit includes an application for the custody of children or guardianship under the Guardians and Ward Act, 1890].

Legal Amendments<!–

 /* Style Definitions */

p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal

   {mso-style-parent:”";

   margin:0in;

   margin-bottom:.0001pt;

   mso-pagination:widow-orphan;

   font-size:12.0pt;

   font-family:”Times New Roman”;

   mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;

   mso-ansi-language:EN-GB;}

h1

   {mso-style-next:Normal;

   margin-top:0in;

   margin-right:1.65in;

   margin-bottom:0in;

   margin-left:0in;

   margin-bottom:.0001pt;

   text-align:justify;

   mso-pagination:widow-orphan;

   page-break-after:avoid;

   mso-outline-level:1;

   font-size:12.0pt;

   font-family:”Times New Roman”;

   mso-font-kerning:0pt;}

@page Section1

   {size:6.35in 841.7pt;

   margin:.75in 0in 2.9pt .35in;

   mso-header-margin:.5in;

   mso-footer-margin:.5in;

   mso-paper-source:0;}

div.Section1

   {page:Section1;}

–>

1.                  Subs, by Notification No. Integ .10.31.64/11,dated 5.4.1966.

2.                  Omitted by ibid.

3.                  Ins. By ibid.

3.             Subject to the provisions of rule 7, the Courts of the District Judge, the Additional District Judge, the Senior Civil Judge, the Civil Judge, First Class and the Civil Judge, First Class (Additional) shall be the Family Courts established for the purposes of the Act.

3 of W.P. Family Court Rules, 1965, read with Pakistan Family Court Act, 1964 and Guardian and Wards Act, 1870, are applicable. Welfare of minor is paramount consideration. Since the Court in Custody of children, exercises parental Jurisdiction, therefore, adherence to techni-calities of law is not proper and Justified.  P.L.J.1996 Kar. 185 = PLD 1996 Kar. 174.

4.‑            (1)        A plaint under subsection (1) of section 7 shall be in writing, signed and verified by the plaintiff and shall be presented to the Court having jurisdiction under rule 5 of these Rules by the plaintiff or through a counsel, and where the plaintiff is a female, by her agent.

(2)        The plaint under sub‑rule (1) shall also contain the following particulars ;.‑

(a)        name of the Court in which the suit is brought and the facts showing that it has jurisdiction;

(b)       the name, description and place of residence of the plaintiff;

(c)                the name, description and place of residence of the defendant so far as can be ascertained;

(d)               where the plaintiff or the defendant is a minor or a person of unsound mind a statement to that effect;,

(e)                the facts constituting the cause of action and the place where and date when it arose; and

(f)                 the nature of the claim and valuation of the  claim with particulars in brief and the relief  claimed.

5.            Where a plaint is presented to a Court not having jurisdiction‑

(a)             the plaint shall be returned to be presented to the Court to which it should have been presented;

b)             the Court returning the plaint shall endorse thereon the date of its presentation to it and its return, the name of the party presenting it, and a brief statement of the reasons therefor.

Court Decisions

Family Court–Jurisdiction—Suit for dissolution of marriage filed in Family Court at Karachi–Defendant’s plea that both parties being Canadian citizens. Court at Karachi lack, jurisdiction to entertain and try such suit—Despite such plea defendant could not show that parties had lost their Pakistani citizen ship—Nikahnama was admittedly registered at Karachi—Plaintiff admittedly was not residing at the given address at Karachi—Marriage between parties having been solemnized in Karachi under Islamic Law, second Nikah at Canada was exercise in futility—Second Nikah over and above existing valid Nikah is not recognized in Islam nor is judicial separation—If all the facts asserted by plaintiff were correct, she was justified in instituting suit in Karachi. PLD 1967 SC 97; PLJ 1979 SC 120 ref. 2002 Lawvision 52 = PLJ 2002 Karachi 117

6.             The Court which shall have jurisdiction to try a suit will be that within the local limits of which‑

(a)             the cause of action wholly or in part has arisen, or

(b)             where the parties reside or last resided together:

Provided that in suits for dissolution of marriage or dower, the Court within the local limits of which the wife ordinarily resides shall also have jurisdiction.

Court Decisions

Dismissal of suit for lack of Jurisdiction. Proviso to R. 6, West Pakistan Family Courts Rules, 1965, enables estranged wife to file suit for dissolution of marriage within local limits of which she ordinarily resides. Words “ordinarily resides” must be construed in context of estranged wife who had left her husband’s abode and had sought residence at any other place of her own choice; such place of her choice would answer to concept “ordinarily resides”. Petitioner ordinarily residing at a place other choice, after separation from her husband, was, thus, competent to bring suit for dissolution of. marriage in the Court of that place. High Court ordinarily would not go into question of fact in Constitutional Jurisdiction but where findings of Courts below on the face of record appeared to be perverse or based on no evidence, High Court even in Constitutional Jurisdiction could take different view. Both Courts below having unlawfully refused to exercise their Jurisdiction on wrong assumption that they did not have such Jurisdiction, their Judgments were set aside.   P.L.J.1997 Lah. 1631 = 1997 CLC 742.

Expresson ordinary resides “does not necessarily mean that residence should belong in point of time, residence for a few days is enough. Court has to see.place where female has chosen to stay regardless of whether she is a permanent resident of place, whether she has property over there or length of time she has resided there.    P.L.J.1996 Lah. 1071 = 1996 CLC 1820.

7.‑ (1)             Suits relating to custody of children and guardianship shall be instituted, heard and tried by the Court of the District Judge, but such Court may transfer any such suit to the Court of the Additional District Judge, the Senior Civil Judge, the Civil Judge, First Class or the Civil Judge, First Class (Additional), having jurisdiction as provided in rule 6, and thereupon the Court to which such suit is so transferred shall have jurisdiction to hear and try the same.

(2)             Suits relating to the custody of children and guardianship shall be instituted, heard and tried in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, the Civil Judge, First Class or the Civil Judge, First Class (Additional), having jurisdiction as provided in rule 6, and where in any district there is no such Court, such suits shall be instituted in and heard and tried by the Court of the District Judge.

(3)             Notwithstanding anything contained in sub‑rules (1) and (2), the Court of District Judge may‑

(a)        recall any suit made over by it for trial under sub‑rule (1) to an Additional District Judge, Senior Civil Judge, Civil Judge, First Class or Civil Judge, First Class (Additional) and either try such suit himself or refer it for trial to any other Court within the District;

(b)       send for the record and proceedings of any suit pending for trial in the Court of the Additional District Judge, Senior Civil Judge, Civil Judge, First Class or the Civil Judge, First Class (Additional) and hear and try the suit itself or refer it for trial to any other Court within the District, and thereupon the District judge or the. Court to which such suit is so transferred, as the case may be, shall have jurisdiction to hear and try the suit.

Legal Amendments<!–

 /* Style Definitions */

p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal

   {mso-style-parent:”";

   margin:0in;

   margin-bottom:.0001pt;

   mso-pagination:widow-orphan;

   font-size:12.0pt;

   font-family:”Times New Roman”;

   mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;

   mso-ansi-language:EN-GB;}

h1

   {mso-style-next:Normal;

   margin-top:0in;

   margin-right:1.65in;

   margin-bottom:0in;

   margin-left:0in;

   margin-bottom:.0001pt;

   text-align:justify;

   mso-pagination:widow-orphan;

   page-break-after:avoid;

   mso-outline-level:1;

   font-size:12.0pt;

   font-family:”Times New Roman”;

   mso-font-kerning:0pt;}

@page Section1

   {size:6.35in 841.7pt;

   margin:.75in 0in 2.9pt .35in;

   mso-header-margin:.5in;

   mso-footer-margin:.5in;

   mso-paper-source:0;}

div.Section1

   {page:Section1;}

–>

PUNJAB AMENDMENT

Sub-rule (2) of rule 7 shall be deleted and sub-rule (1) of rule 7 shall be re-numbered as Rule 7 . by notification No. legis 4 (24)/72,dated 7.4. 1972.

8.             The Court of the District Judge may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, stay the proceedings of any suit pending in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Civil Judge, First Class or Civil Judge, First Class (Additional).

 Legal Amendments<!–

 /* Style Definitions */

p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal

   {mso-style-parent:”";

   margin:0in;

   margin-bottom:.0001pt;

   mso-pagination:widow-orphan;

   font-size:12.0pt;

   font-family:”Times New Roman”;

   mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;

   mso-ansi-language:EN-GB;}

h1

   {mso-style-next:Normal;

   margin-top:0in;

   margin-right:1.65in;

   margin-bottom:0in;

   margin-left:0in;

   margin-bottom:.0001pt;

   text-align:justify;

   mso-pagination:widow-orphan;

   page-break-after:avoid;

   mso-outline-level:1;

   font-size:12.0pt;

   font-family:”Times New Roman”;

   mso-font-kerning:0pt;}

@page Section1

   {size:6.35in 841.7pt;

   margin:.75in 0in 2.9pt .35in;

   mso-header-margin:.5in;

   mso-footer-margin:.5in;

   mso-paper-source:0;}

div.Section1

   {page:Section1;}

–>

PUNJAB AMENDMENT

Rule 8 shall be deleted by notification No. legis 4 (24)/72,dated 7.4. 1972.

9.             On transfer of a case from one Court to another it shall not be necessary to commence the proceedings before the succeeding Judge de novo unless the Judge for reasons to be recorded in writing directs otherwise.

Legal Amendments<!–

 /* Style Definitions */

p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal

   {mso-style-parent:”";

   margin:0in;

   margin-bottom:.0001pt;

   mso-pagination:widow-orphan;

   font-size:12.0pt;

   font-family:”Times New Roman”;

   mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;

   mso-ansi-language:EN-GB;}

h1

   {mso-style-next:Normal;

   margin-top:0in;

   margin-right:1.65in;

   margin-bottom:0in;

   margin-left:0in;

   margin-bottom:.0001pt;

   text-align:justify;

   mso-pagination:widow-orphan;

   page-break-after:avoid;

   mso-outline-level:1;

   font-size:12.0pt;

   font-family:”Times New Roman”;

   mso-font-kerning:0pt;}

@page Section1

   {size:6.35in 841.7pt;

   margin:.75in 0in 2.9pt .35in;

   mso-header-margin:.5in;

   mso-footer-margin:.5in;

   mso-paper-source:0;}

div.Section1

   {page:Section1;}

–>

PUNJAB AMENDMENT

Rule 9 shall be deleted by notification No. legis 4 (24)/72,dated 7.4. 1972.

10.‑            (1)        The Court may, where it deems fit, direct that the  whole or any part of the proceedings under the Act be held in camera.

(2)               Where both the parties to the suit request the Court to hold the proceedings in camera, the Court shall do so.

10-A. (1)        The evidence of each witness shall be taken down in writing, in the language of the Court by the Presiding Officer of the Court, or in his presence and hearing and under his personal direction and superintendence and shall be signed by the presiding officer of the Court.

(2)               When the evidence of a witness is given in English , the presiding officer of the Court may take it down in that language with his own hand and unless the parties request the Court otherwise, and authenticated translation of such evidence in the language of the Court shall form part of the record.

(3)               When the evidence of a witness is given in any other language, not being English, or the language of the Court, the presiding officer of the Court may take it down in that language with his own hand, or cause it to be taken down in that language in his presence and hearing and under his personal direction and superintendence, and an authenticated translation of such evidence in the language of the Court or in English shall form part of the record.

(4)               In cases in which the evidence is not taken down in writing by the presiding officer of the Court, he shall, as the examination of each witness proceeds, make a memorandum of the substance of what such witness deposes; and such memorandum shall be written and signed by the presiding officer of the Court with his own hand, and shall form part of the record.

(5)               As the evidence of each witness taken down is completed, it shall be read over to him, and shall, if necessary, be corrected.

(6)               If the witness denies the correctness of any part of evidence when the same is read over to him, the presiding officer of the Court may, instead of correcting the evidence, make a memorandum thereon of the objections made to it by the witness, and shall add such remarks as he thinks necessary.

(7)               If the evidence is taken down in a language different form that in which it has been given and the witness does not understand the language in which it is taken down, the evidence so taken down shall be interpreted to him in the language in which it was given, or in a language which he understands.

(8)               When the Court has recorded the evidence of a witness, it shall also record such remarks (if necessary) as it thinks material respecting the demeanour  of such witness whilst under examination.

Legal Amendments<!–

 /* Style Definitions */

p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal

   {mso-style-parent:”";

   margin:0in;

   margin-bottom:.0001pt;

   mso-pagination:widow-orphan;

   font-size:12.0pt;

   font-family:”Times New Roman”;

   mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;

   mso-ansi-language:EN-GB;}

h1

   {mso-style-next:Normal;

   margin-top:0in;

   margin-right:1.65in;

   margin-bottom:0in;

   margin-left:0in;

   margin-bottom:.0001pt;

   text-align:justify;

   mso-pagination:widow-orphan;

   page-break-after:avoid;

   mso-outline-level:1;

   font-size:12.0pt;

   font-family:”Times New Roman”;

   mso-font-kerning:0pt;}

@page Section1

   {size:6.35in 841.7pt;

   margin:.75in 0in 2.9pt .35in;

   mso-header-margin:.5in;

   mso-footer-margin:.5in;

   mso-paper-source:0;}

div.Section1

   {page:Section1;}

–>

1.            S.10 ins. 22  w.p. Notification no.  Integ. 10-31/64, dated 21-2-1967

11.                   Where the parties agree to a compromise or conciliation effected between them under subsection (3) of section 10 or subsection (1) of section 12, the Court shall pass a decree or give decision in the suit in terms of the compromise or conciliation agreed to between the parties, as the case may be. .

12.‑            (1)        Where the plaintiff or his pleader, makes default in  appearing before the Court, the suit may be dismissed in default.

(2)             The Court may restore a suit dismissed in default on sufficient cause shown, on application made to it within thirty days of the dismissal in default.

13.       Ex parte decree or proceedings may, for sufficient cause shown, be set aside by the Court on application made to it within thirty days of the passing of the decree or decision.

14.            (1)        Every judgment or order shall be written by the   presiding Judge or from the dictation of such Judge in  the language of the Court, or in English and shall be dated and signed by the Judge in open Court at the time of pronouncing it.

(2)             Judgments and orders which are appealable shall contain the point or points for determination, the decision thereon and the reasons in brief for the decision.

REGISTERS OF CASES, DECREES, ORDERS, ETC.

15.            When a plaint has been filed, its particulars shall be entered in a register to be kept in the form prescribed for Civil Suits under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

16.            In every suit, on passing the judgment, a decree shall be drawn up in Form I and shall be signed by the presiding Judge. The decree shall bear the seal of the Court.

Court Decisions

Family Courts Rules, 1965. Accumulated effect. Article 199 of Constitution of Pakistan Article 181 of Limitation Act. Compromised Judgment/decree. Non preparedness of decree sheet alongwith Judgment. Execution rejected by Family Court on ground of limitation. Judgment of Family Court set aside in appeal. Writ against. Family Court required to give decree sheet on announcement of Judgment and decree can be executed and not Judgment. Limitation would commence from date when decree actually drawn and signed. Period elapsed between announcement of Judgment and signing of decree shall be treated period requisite for obtaining certified copy and neglect on part of Court. Judgment not .executable in absence of decree sheet. Delay in execution is condoned.  P.L.J.1999 Lah. 236 = 1999 MLD 216.

17.             The Court shall maintain a register of decrees and orders in the form prescribed for decrees and orders under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

18.             Whenever any fine is paid under section 15 or section 16 or money or property is deposited with or realized by the Court under the Act or these rules, a receipt shall be given in Form II which shall be serially numbered and the counterfoil thereof shall be kept in the Court.

19.             All fines, monies, or property deposited or realized and disbursed by the Court shall be entered in a register in Form III.

20.             Where the Court receives any amount payable to a party it shall cause a notice thereof to be served on the’ party entitled to receive it and shall pay it to the party concerned within four days, so far as may be of his applying therefor.

21        The records of the Court; including its registers, shall be preserved for such period as is provided under the rules of the High Court applicable to Civil Courts.

APPEALS

¹[22.‑            (1)        An appeal under section 14 against the decree or

decision passed by the Court shall be preferred to the High Court within thirty days of the passing of the decree or decision, excluding the time requisite for obtaining copies thereof;

Provided that the High Court may, for sufficient cause, extend the said period.]

(2)               The appeal shall be in writing, shall set out the grounds on  which the appellant seeks to challenge the decree or decision, shall contain the names, description and addresses of the parties, and shall bear the signature of the appellant or his counsel.

(3)               A certified copy of the decree and decision of the Court where a decree is passed, and a copy of the decision where only an order is passed shall be attached with the appeal.

(4)       Any order passed by the High Court on appeal shall, as soon as may be, be communicated to the Court concerned and the Court shall modify or amend the decree or decision accordingly and shall also make necessary entries to that effect in the appropriate column of the register of decrees.]

 Legal Amendments

<!–

 /* Style Definitions */

p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal

   {mso-style-parent:”";

   margin:0in;

   margin-bottom:.0001pt;

   mso-pagination:widow-orphan;

   font-size:12.0pt;

   font-family:”Times New Roman”;

   mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;

   mso-ansi-language:EN-GB;}

h1

   {mso-style-next:Normal;

   margin-top:0in;

   margin-right:1.65in;

   margin-bottom:0in;

   margin-left:0in;

   margin-bottom:.0001pt;

   text-align:justify;

   mso-pagination:widow-orphan;

   page-break-after:avoid;

   mso-outline-level:1;

   font-size:12.0pt;

   font-family:”Times New Roman”;

   mso-font-kerning:0pt;}

@page Section1

   {size:6.35in 841.7pt;

   margin:.75in 0in 2.9pt .35in;

   mso-header-margin:.5in;

   mso-footer-margin:.5in;

   mso-paper-source:0;}

div.Section1

   {page:Section1;}

–>

1.                  sub.rule 22(1) subs. By W.P. notification No. Integ. 10-31/64, dated 21-2-67.

2.                  sub.rule 22(4) subs. By W.P. notification No. Integ. 10-31/64, dated 21-2-67.

Court Decisions

Family Court Rules 1965, R. 22(3) Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908), O.XLI, R. 1. Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, Art. 199. Petitioner did not challenge decree passed against him in respondent’s suit for dissolution of marriage; only decree which he challenged was in suit for dower filed by respondent. Effect. Where two or more suits had been consolidated and decided by means of one Judgment, affected party would have option to challenge all decrees passed on basis of consolidated Judgment by means of one appeal provided if certified copies of all decrees, which were challenged in appeal were filed with appeal. Petitioner admittedly did not filed certified copy of decree for dissolution of marriage before lower Appellate Court^ Even grounds of appeal showed that only challenge made by petitioner was in respect of decree passed against him in suit for recovery of dower and he did not challenge decree of dissolution of marriage on basis thereof. Provision of R. 22(3) Family Courts Rules 1965, made it obligatory on party preferring appeal against decree dissolution of marriage to file certified copy of such decree before Appellate Court. Filing of certified copies of all decrees in consolidated litigation at the time of preferring single appeal being essential requirement of law, could not be dispensed with by Appellate Court. In addition thereto, High Court would not interfere with impugned Judgment which has been passed in accordance with law. Judgment of Appellate had been dismissed on account of failure to file certified copies of Consolidated cases.   P.L.J.2000 Lah. 417.

RECORDS AND THEIR INSPECTION

23.            ‑ (1)             The Court shall, on the application of any party to a dispute, allow inspection of the records of the Court relating to the dispute on payment of a fee of fifty paisa.

(2)            On the application of any party to a suit, certified copies of the decree or decision or other proceedings or entry in any register maintained under these rules or of any portion thereof shall be supplied on payment of a fee calculated at the rate of 25 paisa for two hundred words or part thereof.

Legal Amendments<!–

 /* Style Definitions */

p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal

   {mso-style-parent:”";

   margin:0in;

   margin-bottom:.0001pt;

   mso-pagination:widow-orphan;

   font-size:12.0pt;

   font-family:”Times New Roman”;

   mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;

   mso-ansi-language:EN-GB;}

h1

   {mso-style-next:Normal;

   margin-top:0in;

   margin-right:1.65in;

   margin-bottom:0in;

   margin-left:0in;

   margin-bottom:.0001pt;

   text-align:justify;

   mso-pagination:widow-orphan;

   page-break-after:avoid;

   mso-outline-level:1;

   font-size:12.0pt;

   font-family:”Times New Roman”;

   mso-font-kerning:0pt;}

@page Section1

   {size:6.35in 841.7pt;

   margin:.75in 0in 2.9pt .35in;

   mso-header-margin:.5in;

   mso-footer-margin:.5in;

   mso-paper-source:0;}

div.Section1

   {page:Section1;}

–>

PUNJAB AMENDMENT

In Rule 23—

(a)               in sub-rule (1), the brackets and figures ‘(1); and

(b)                sub-rule (2)

(c)                shall be deleted. By  notification No. O. P. 8(1)/71, dated 7-8-71.

24.‑      (1)        There shall be kept in the office of every Court a seal of the Court which shall be circular in shape and shall have thereon the inscription `Family Court’ and the name of the District.

(2)               The seal of the Court shall be used on all summonses,  orders, decrees, copies and other documents issued under the Act or these rules.

FORM I

(See Rule 16)

Form of Decree

In the Family Court———————————————-

1.            Case No.—————————————————

2.            ———————————————–Petitioner/Plaintiff

Versus

             ————————–Defendant/Respondent

3.            Claim for——————————-This suit coming this day for final disposal before this Family Court, it is hereby  ordered that—————————-

Date———————

Seal of Court.

                                                                        Signature of the Judge

Family Court at————–

FORM II

(See Rule18)

1.            Name of the Family Court——————————————-

2.            Name of the payer—————————————————–

3.            Amount of fine, money or property pai—————————-

4.            Particulars of the case and purpose of payment——————-

5.            Date of payment——————————————————-

(Steal)——————————————————————-

Signature of the Judge

Family Court—————

FORM III

(See Rule 16)

Register of Receipts and Disursement

FAMILY COURT OF———————————————————

1.                  Serial No.

2.                  Name and address of the payer.

3.                  Amount or property paid, realized or deposited.

4.                  Particulars of the case.

5.                  Date of receipt.

6.                  No. of receipt in Form II.

7.                  Signature of the Judge, Family Court.

8.                  Date of disbursement with the name of the person to whom the money or property is paid or delivered.

REMARKS.

***************************

S. 4 is clear and unambiguous and one cannot fall back upon preamble to alter meanings of words in S. 4Retrospective intent not inferred. P L J 1981 Supreme Court 100

Suit or dissolution of marriage decreed on around of cruelty shown by husband-Appeal nos provided—Writ petition on basis of “no evidence”— Record evincing that cruelty though not physical but’ certainly mental meted out to wife—Constitutional Jurisdiction not Invoked to weigh evidencs and draw another possible Inference, P L J 1980 Karachi 239 

Exercise of option of puberty Contention dial since dissolution of marriage on account of exercise of right of option of puberty had not been ratified by Court within the age of 18 years. suit wa righty dismissed -Held : contention has no force, Court’s order is not essential for Imparting validity to the exercise of option of pubertyCourt may give a declaration to that effect in any proceedings. P. L. J. 1981 Lahore 112

Effect of conversion Appellant (Muslim wife) renouncing Islam in 1924 converting as Christian-Marriage with her husband ‘A’ automatically dissolved-Appellant reverting and embracing Islam and marrying RAppellant (in civil proceedings) not to prove second marriage (with R) beyond reasonable doubtR in certain civil proceedings had also acknowledged appellant as his wife-Appellant, held, as wife of R (deceased) and other appellants as children of wedlock. P L J 1981 Supreme Court 100

Repudiation of marriage–What procedure is prescribed for repudiating marriage–When minor girl is given in marriage by her father or other guardian during her age of minority, then she has right to exercise, ‘Khair-ul-Balugh’ for repudiating marriage on attaining age of eighteen years–Statute does not prescribe any particular form or procedure for repudiation of marriage–Held: Repudiation of marriage may be by oral words or even by conduct signifying rejection of marriage. PLJ 1997 Shariat Court (AJ&K) 68

Constitutional petition–Wife seeking dissolution of marriage, inter alia, on ground of fraud which would suggest that element of love was lacking between them right from inception of marriage–Element of fraud as deposed by wife was that husband had told her that he had obtained permission of his first wife which as per statement of wife was false statement–Marriage had taken place in dubious circumstances i.e. at taxi drivers place about which even elders of family did not know nor they participated and blessed the couple–Even if vital age differences between parties were ignored, still circumstances which had come in evidence would reveal that marriage had taken place in dubious circumstances to satisfy worldly lust and not for seeking heavenly blessings–Order for dissolution of marriage passed by Trial Court was, thus, just and proper in circumstances. PLJ 1999 Karachi 124

Suit decreed on ground of impotency–Constitutional petition by husband–Requirement of law–Decree was passed by learned Judge Family Court on 28.11.1996, but before that husband had filed application contents whereof fully covered requirements of Proviso (c) and hence no decree could be passed unless further requirements of  Proviso(c) were complied with–Evidence on record indicates that husband and wife have tried to produce their own medical certificates by consulting doctors themselves and without having been referred for such examination by court–Held : Fancily court had acted without jurisdiction and also has exercised jurisdiction not vested in her–Petition accepted and case remanded back to Judge Family Court for giving decision fresh after complying with provision of Proviso(c) to Section 2 of Dissolution of PLJ 1998 Peshawar 241

Physical weakness of husband as a ground for dissolution of marriage taken by wife. is not provided anywhere as a ground–Physical weakness does not reflect impotency, therefore, ground of impotency as given in S. 2(v)(c) of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act 1939, was not available to wife and marriage of spouses could not dissolved on such ground. PLJ 2004 Lahore 183

Suit for dissolution of marriage on the basis of option of puberty–Trial Court dissolved marriage on the basis of Khula–Defendants plea that Khula having not been pleaded in suit filed by plaintiff dissolution of marriage on such ground was not warranted, has no substance as suit filed by plaintiff was suit for dissolution of marriage, thus, Court had to keep under consideration whether marital spouses can live within limits prescribed by God Almighty–Where Court was convinced that marriage cannot subsist then Court can always dissolve marriage on basis the of Khula even if the same was not pleaded in plaint–Perusal of evidence showed that defendant was already married having two wives and children and he had ulterior designs of capturing property inherited by plaintiff–Family Court had, thus, rightly dissolved marriage on the ground of Khula.PLJ 2003 Lahore 1592

(Pb Ordinance XXIII of 1971)

2^nd  December 1971

An Ordinance further to amend the

Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929, in its application to the Province of the Punjab

Preamble : –

WHEREAS it is expedient further to amend the Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929, in its application to the Province of the Punjab, in the manner hereinafter appearing;

NOW, THEREFORE, in pursuance of the Martial Law Proclamation of 25th March, 1969, read with the Provisional Constitution Order, and in exercise of all powers enabling him in that behalf, the Governor of the Punjab is pleased to make and promulgate the following Ordinance:-

1.            Short title, extent and commencement : – (1) This Ordinance may be called the Child Marriage Restraint (Punjab Amendment) Ordinance, 1971.

(2)            It extends to the whole of the Punjab.

(3)            It shall come into force at once.

2.            Amendment of section 2 of Act XIX of 1929 : – In the Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929, as amended by section 12 of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961, in its application to the Province of the Punjab, hereinafter referred to as the said Act, in section 2 : –

(i) at the end of clause (c), the word “and” shall be added;

(ii) the colon appearing at the end of clause (d) shall be replaced by a full-stop; and

(iii) clause (e) shall be omitted.

3.            Amendment of section 9 of Act XIX of 1929 : – In section 9 of the said Act, the words and commas “except on a complaint made by the Union Council, or if there is no Union Council in the area, by such authority as the Provincial Government may in this behalf prescribe, and such cognizance shall in no case be taken” occurring after the words “under this Act” and before the words “after the expiry” shall be omitted.